Both Dr. Wells and I often write, as clinicians, about the changing landscape in healthcare, bemoaning how administrators or technologies break the patient-physician relationship. But sometimes there is a self-inflicted wound when physicians for a variety of reasons move away from caring for patients to providing procedures. A presentation at the recent European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions is, unfortunately, a perfect example. (The inclusion of intervention in their title is the first clue that we may have a problem)
Keith Humphreys, a psychologist, writes about opioids for the Washington Post. But he has an unusual take on the matter. Does Humphreys know what he's talking about? Let's see.
Sometimes a study leaves you gobstruck – and not in a good way. A current article in Circulation: Heart Failure looks at how dietary protein intake impacts the risk of heart failure. Basically, this is a study of 2441 Finnish men age 42 to 60 studied over a mean period of 22 years looking at the incidence of heart failure based on the amount of protein in their diet. Their finding
“In middle-aged men, higher protein intake was marginally associated with increased risk of HF (heart failure).”
Can the FDA's tactics to impact the current opioid problem also predict its successor?
This week, Laurent Duvernay-Tardif, an NFL offensive lineman, graduated from McGill University’s medical school while an active player for the Kansas City Chiefs. In football's modern era, if not the NFL's entire history, his fascinating accomplishment – the first active player to hold a medical degree – appears to be unprecedented.
With the proposed consumer privacy initiative in California a reaction to internet data abuse, it is time, even overdue, to discuss the murky territory once presumed protected health information has entered.
With Glyphosate, Science Claws Out A Victory In France, While Ramazinni Loses More Credibility In Belgium
In 2017, French President Emmanuel Macron held fast with his environmental allies against science and declared they would ban the herbicide glyphosate despite the overwhelming consensus on its safety and necessity.
The ubiquitous television advertising about prescription drugs is highly structured by the FDA and helps to explain why the speaker is talking so fast at the end of the advertisement.
In our postmodern society -- where truth is relative, "fake news" is prevalent, and scientific facts are just an opinion -- it shouldn't come as a surprise that modern medicine is facing a backlash.
Evidence-based medicine, which is supported by a bedrock of biomedical science, literally has saved the lives of billions of people. Yet, modern medicine has been sustaining an assault from multiple fronts in recent years.
Eight activist environmental groups are being represented by a bunch of lawyers from a group called Earth(in)justice in a lawsuit against the FDA. What do they want? To force the FDA to remove seven food chemicals from its "permitted" artificial flavor list. But there are the same chemicals that are naturally found in all kinds of foods. We use Nanogodzilla to demonstrate pure foolishness.